Skip to content

Randomised trial, 2025

Does aroma massage therapy reduce premenstrual syndrome symptoms?

Aroma massage therapy significantly reduced PMS symptoms in the experimental group compared to control. However, the study design was quasi-experimental rather than a true randomized trial.

Early or limited evidence 60 B.Sc. Nursing students with PMS

What they did

60 B.Sc. Nursing students with PMS were assigned to an experimental group (30) or control group (30). The experimental group received aroma massage therapy. PMS symptoms were measured before and after using a standardized pain intensity scale.

What they found

There was a clear difference in PMS symptom scores between the experimental and control groups after treatment. No clear associations were found between baseline PMS scores and demographic variables.

What it means for you

Aroma massage therapy appeared to reduce PMS symptoms. However, the study design was quasi-experimental rather than fully randomized, and participants were nursing students, so results may not apply to all women with PMS.

60

women studied

30

in experimental group

30

in control group

About the study

Original title
“A Quasi Experimental Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Aroma Massage Therapy on Premenstrual Syndrome among B.sc. Nursing Students of Dadra and Nagar Haveli & Daman & Diu”
Authors
KM CHAUHAN, M. Sunil Mathew
Journal
International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research
Year
2025
Study design
Randomised trial
What was tested
Aroma massage therapy
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Abstract A quasi experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of aromatherapy on premenstrual syndrome among B.Sc. Nursing Students of Dadra and Nagar Haveli & Daman & Diu. Method: those students having PMS randomly assigned to experimental group (30) and control group (30) by purposive sampling method. Standardized numerical pain intensity scale were used to assess the premenstrual syndrome during pre-test and post-test of aroma massage among experimental and control group of B.Sc. Nursing students. Results: data analysis was done using mean, SD, paired, unpaired’- tests and chi square. The results revels there is a significant difference in the premenstrual syndrome between the experimental group and control group (t=8.553p<0.0001) after the administration of aroma massage therapy. So, the research hypothesis H1 is accepted at 0.05 level of significance. The demographic data was depicted that there was no significant association between pre-test premenstrual syndrome score with selected demographic variable among B.Sc. Nursing students.

Reproduced under CC-BY-SA.

Topics