Skip to content

Systematic review, 2022

Do herbal medicines and nutritional supplements help premenstrual syndrome symptoms?

Yes, herbal medicines and nutritional supplements appear effective in reducing PMS symptoms, especially physical symptoms. Adverse events were mild or absent in most trials.

Strong study design 1211 patients with premenstrual syndrome across 15 randomized controlled trials

What they did

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Screened 754 articles from multiple databases. Included 15 randomized controlled trials with 1211 total patients. Used standardized statistical methods to combine results across studies.

What they found

Interventions reduced overall PMS symptoms significantly. Physical symptoms improved most with large effect. Behavioral symptoms showed smaller improvements. Mood symptoms showed unclear improvement. Mild adverse events were reported in only 4 of the 15 trials.

What it means for you

Herbal medicines and nutritional supplements may be safe and effective for PMS, particularly physical symptoms like pain and bloating. The authors noted that the original studies were poor quality, and results varied between studies. More rigorous high-quality trials are needed to confirm these findings.

754

Articles screened

15

Randomized controlled trials included

1211

Total patients studied

About the study

Original title
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Premenstrual Syndrome with Special Emphasis on Herbal Medicine and Nutritional Supplements
Authors
Sultana A, Heyat MBB, Rahman K et al.
Journal
Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)
Year
2022
Study design
Systematic review
What was tested
Herbal medicines and nutritional supplements
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Herbal medicine and nutritional supplements are suggested to treat premenstrual somatic and psycho-behavioural symptoms in clinical guidelines; nonetheless, this is at present based on poor-quality trial evidence. Hence, we aimed to design a systematic review and meta-analysis for their effectiveness in alleviating premenstrual symptoms. The published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were extracted from Google scholar, PubMed, Scopus and PROSPERO databases. The risk of bias in randomized trials was assessed by Cochrane risk-of-bias tool . The main outcome parameters were analysed separately based on the Premenstrual Symptom Screening Tool and PMTS and DRSP scores. Secondary parameters of somatic, psychological, and behavioural subscale symptoms of PSST were also analysed. Data synthesis was performed assuming a random-effects model, and standardized mean difference (SMDs) was analysed using SPSS version 28.0.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). A total of 754 articles were screened, and 15 RCTs were included ( n = 1211 patients). Primary results for participants randomized to an intervention reported reduced PSST ( n = 9), PMTS ( n = 2), and DSR ( n = 4) scores with (SMD = -1.44; 95% CI: -1.72 to -1.17), (SMD = -1.69; 95% CI: -3.80 to 0.42) and (SMD = 2.86; 95% CI: 1.02 to 4.69) verses comparator with substantial heterogeneity. Physical (SMD = -1.61; 95% CI = -2.56 to -0.66), behavioural (SMD = -0.60; 95% CI = -1.55 to0.35) and mood (SMD = 0.57; 95% CI = -0.96 to 2.11) subscale symptom groupings of PSST displayed similar findings. Fifty-three studies ( n = 8) were considered at low risk of bias with high quality. Mild adverse events were reported by four RCTs. Based on the existing evidence, herbal medicine and nutritional supplements may be effective and safe for PMS.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics