Skip to content

Survey study, 2024

What is the impact of PMS on undergraduate girls and does lifestyle affect it?

Most girls (56.9%) experienced severe PMS impact and 42.5% experienced moderate impact. Most girls had average lifestyle habits, but lifestyle and age did not predict PMS severity.

Early or limited evidence 160 undergraduate girls in selected colleges

What they did

A cross-sectional descriptive study with 160 undergraduate girls. They assessed lifestyle using a scoring tool and measured PMS impact using a standardized scale. Researchers provided an information booklet about PMS.

What they found

For PMS impact: 56.9% had severe, 42.5% had moderate, and 0.6% had mild. For lifestyle: 90% had average lifestyle, 0.6% had poor lifestyle, and 99.4% had healthy lifestyle. No significant associations were found between age or other demographics and PMS severity.

What it means for you

More than half of undergraduate girls experience severe PMS impact on their daily functioning. Surprisingly, lifestyle habits and age did not predict who would have worse PMS in this group. The main limits are no control group for comparison, cross-sectional design, and the lifestyle scoring seems unusual with 99.4% in the healthy range.

56.9%

had severe PMS impact

42.5%

had moderate PMS impact

90%

had average lifestyle

About the study

Original title
Assessment of lifestyle and impact of premenstrual syndrome among undergraduate girls studying in selected colleges in a view to develop an information booklet
Authors
Mrs. Reshma Salve
Journal
African Journal of Biomedical Research
Year
2024
Study design
Survey study
Participants
200
What was tested
Information booklet provided about PMS
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

The social history of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and phenomena is entangled with the social history of gender relations. In early 1980s PMS became a household term. Popular press articles told women how to “beat the Blues”, “overcome the menstrual uglies” and negotiate interpersonal relations during those times of month. Clinicians and researchers met at international conferences to discuss definition, etiology and possible treatment of a syndrome estimated by some to affect 80% of women. Methodology: A Quantitative research approach was used for this study. Research design adopted was non experimental descriptive research design. The sample selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria in selected colleges. The sample size was adopted for the study is 200 samples taken and in that find out the prevalence and after screening the girls to select the 160 sample in this study by power analysis formula. Sampling technique used for the study Non Probability Purposive sampling technique. The study proceeded after the sanction by institutional ethic committee and permission was opted from the government officials to conduct the study in selected area colleges. Informed consent was taken from all the participants and confidentiality and anonymity was maintaining throughout the procedure. Tool used for the study was divided under three sections including consent from and information booklet provide to the participants regarding premenstrual syndrome. Result: 0.6% of the undergraduate girls had poor lifestyle (score 20-40), 90% of them had average lifestyle (Score 41-60) and 99.4% of them had healthy lifestyle (score 61-80) of premenstrual syndrome. 0.6% of the undergraduate girls had mild impact of premenstrual syndrome (score 0-3), 42.5% of them had moderate impact of premenstrual syndrome (score 4-6) and 56.9% of them had severe impact of premenstrual syndrome (score 7-10). Conclusion: Study concludes to assessment and findings of lifestyle and impact of premenstrual syndrome. There is no significant association between study findings with selected demographic variables in selected colleges.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics