Skip to content

Randomised trial, 2019

Can menstrual apps designed for user needs improve health outcomes?

Yes. Apps designed to meet users' needs led to better symptom tracking, higher satisfaction, and improved confidence in managing symptoms.

Moderate study design Women with dysmenorrhea and premenstrual syndrome

What they did

Double-blind randomized controlled trial. Women with dysmenorrhea and PMS used either App A (selected based on user needs) or App B (most popular worldwide). Intervention lasted 4 months to include at least 3 menstrual cycles. Users tracked symptoms and reported on app quality, satisfaction, and symptom management.

What they found

61 women completed the 16-week intervention. App A users showed significant improvements in satisfaction, outcome expectancy, number of days with records, social influence, intent to recommend, and likelihood of behavior or cognitive changes. Number of menus used increased over time in App A. App self-efficacy and relief methods increased in App A users but did not significantly differ between groups.

What it means for you

A menstrual app designed around what women actually need may help them track symptoms more consistently and feel more satisfied using it. However, this study measured app usage and satisfaction rather than actual symptom improvement. Study included only 61 women, a relatively small sample.

61

Women who completed study

4 months

Duration of app use

16 weeks

Total study duration

About the study

Original title
Can menstrual health apps selected based on users' needs change health-related factors? A double-blind randomized controlled trial
Authors
Lee J, Kim J
Journal
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA
Year
2019
Study design
Randomised trial
What was tested
Use of menstrual app selected based on user needs or most popular app for 4 months
Open access
Yes

Topics