Skip to content

Case-control study, 2024

Do women with PMDD have permanent differences in brain structure?

Yes. Women with PMDD have thinner brain surface and lower folding patterns than women without PMDD, regardless of menstrual cycle phase. This suggests these are stable features of PMDD, not just temporary changes.

Moderate study design Women with PMDD and healthy control women

What they did

Women with PMDD and healthy controls had MRI brain scans during two menstrual cycle phases: mid-follicular and late-luteal. Researchers measured cortical thickness, gyrification (brain folding), cortical complexity, and sulcal depth.

What they found

Regardless of menstrual cycle phase, women with PMDD showed thinner cortex (0.3 to 1.1) and lower gyrification (0.4 to 1.0) than controls. All participants showed decreased cortical thickness (0.4 to 1.7) from the mid-follicular to late-luteal phase. Menstrual cycle-specific changes in cortical folding (0.4 to 2.2) were observed in both groups.

What it means for you

PMDD may involve stable brain structure differences that exist regardless of cycle phase, suggesting permanent rather than temporary changes. The effect sizes were small and larger studies are needed to understand whether these are stable markers or develop over time.

0.3-1.1

Cortical thickness in PMDD

0.4-1.0

Gyrification in PMDD

0.4-2.2

Brain folding variation across cycle

About the study

Original title
Cortical morphology variations during the menstrual cycle in individuals with and without premenstrual dysphoric disorder
Authors
Dubol M, Stiernman L, Sundström-Poromaa I et al.
Journal
Journal of affective disorders
Year
2024
Study design
Case-control study
What was tested
Structural brain imaging at two menstrual cycle phases
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Background: Premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) is hypothesized to stem from maladaptive neural sensitivity to ovarian steroid hormone fluctuations. Recently, we found thinner cortices in individuals with PMDD, compared to healthy controls, during the symptomatic phase. Here, we aimed at investigating whether such differences illustrate state-like characteristics specific to the symptomatic phase, or trait-like features defining PMDD. Methods: Patients and controls were scanned using structural magnetic resonance imaging during the mid-follicular and late-luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. Group-by-phase interaction effects on cortical architecture metrics (cortical thickness, gyrification index, cortical complexity, and sulcal depth) were assessed using surface-based morphometry. Results: Independently of menstrual cycle phase, a main effect of diagnostic group on surface metrics was found, primarily illustrating thinner cortices (0.3 1.1) and lower gyrification indices (0.4 1.0) in patients compared to controls. Furthermore, menstrual cycle-specific effects were detected across all participants, depicting a decrease in cortical thickness (0.4 1.7) and region-dependent changes in cortical folding metrics (0.4 2.2) from the mid-follicular to the late luteal phase. Limitations: Small effects (d = 0.3) require a larger sample size to be accurately characterized. Conclusions: These findings provide initial evidence of trait-like cortical characteristics of the brain of individuals with premenstrual dysphoric disorder, together with indications of menstrual cycle-related variations in cortical architecture in patients and controls. Further investigations exploring whether these differences constitute stable vulnerability markers or develop over the years may help understand PMDD etiology.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics