Skip to content

Survey study, 2022

Do women with premenstrual syndrome think differently than women without it?

Women with PMS think differently in some ways than women without symptoms, but not as drastically as women with depression. Women with both PMS and depression have the most distorted thinking patterns.

Moderate study design 127 women aged 19-35 with a mix of PMS, depression, both, or neither

What they did

Cross-sectional study of 127 women aged 19-35 divided into four groups: asymptomatic, PMS only (nondepressed), depression only, and both PMS and depression. Researchers diagnosed PMS using daily reports and depression using SCID-IV. They measured thinking patterns using three tools: Cognitive Triad Inventory, Metacognitive Belief Questionnaire, and self-referent information processing task.

What they found

Women with depression had more distorted thinking than asymptomatic women. Women with PMS had similar thinking patterns to asymptomatic women in some ways but differed on other measures. The menstrual cycle phase at the time of testing (follicular vs. luteal) was not a significant factor. Among depressed women, those with PMS had even more distorted thinking than those without PMS.

What it means for you

PMS alone may not cause the same distorted thinking patterns as depression, but women with both conditions think very differently. The timing of testing in the menstrual cycle didn't matter. Main limits: cross-sectional study, moderate sample size, and no intervention tested.

127

women studied

4

groups compared

19-35

age range in years

About the study

Original title
Differences in Cognitive Triad, Biased Information Processing, and Metacognitive Beliefs Between Women with Depression and Premenstrual Syndrome
Authors
Andrzej Śliwerski, Karolina Koszałkowska, Aleksandra Mrowicka et al.
Journal
International Journal of Cognitive Therapy
Year
2022
Study design
Survey study
Participants
127
What was tested
None (comparison study)
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Abstract The timing of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) suggests that hormonal fluctuations are a key component in its pathogenesis. Unfortunately, women with PMS cannot be distinguished from asymptomatic women regarding biological markers. Research suggests that increased susceptibility to hormonal changes among women with PMS may be explained by the theory of cognitive vulnerability to affective disorders. The study group comprised 127 women (aged 19–35). The participants were divided into four groups: asymptomatic, nondepressed with PMS, depressed without PMS, and both depressed and with PMS. PMS was diagnosed by prospective daily reports, and depression by SCID-IV. All participants completed the Cognitive triad inventory (CTI), Metacognitive belief questionnaire (MCQ-30), and the self-referent information processing task (SRET) randomly either in the follicular or luteal phase. Findings indicated that only the asymptomatic women differed in cognitive processing from the depressed women. Those with PMS, despite demonstrating a slightly greater intensity of distorted cognitive processing, did not differ significantly from the asymptomatic participants; however, they differed from those with depression regarding in the cognitive triad. The phase of the cycle was not a significant factor in differentiating distorted cognitive processing. Depressed women have more distorted cognitive processes than non-depressed women. Women with PMS appear to be a group that lies between asymptomatic women and those who suffer from depression. Moreover, among women with depression, those with PMS have even more severe distorted cognitive processing than those without PMS.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics