Randomised trial, 2022
Does online counselling using cognitive-behavioral techniques help PMS symptoms?
This abstract is a data description and does not report the study results.
What they did
92 female university students aged 18-35 with moderate to severe PMS were randomly divided into groups. The intervention group received internet-based counselling using cognitive-behavioral techniques for two months. Symptoms, quality of life, disability, and attitudes toward menstruation were measured at baseline and after the intervention.
What they found
This abstract describes the data collection methods but does not report the results or findings from the trial.
What it means for you
This is a methods paper describing the data from a trial rather than reporting whether the intervention worked. To learn the results, you would need to find the full paper with results.
92
students studied
18-35
age range
2 months
intervention duration
About the study
- Original title
- Effect of internet-based counselling with a cognitive-behavioural approach on premenstrual syndrome
- Authors
- Borji-Navan S, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Esmaeilpour K et al.
- Journal
- BMC research notes
- Year
- 2022
- Study design
- Randomised trial
- Participants
- 92
- What was tested
- Internet-based counselling with cognitive-behavioral approach
- Open access
- Yes
- Read the paper
- doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06222-w
Original abstract
Objectives: To assess the effect of internet-based counselling with a cognitive-behavioural approach on symptom severity of women with premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and their quality of life during the perimenstrual and late follicular phases of the menstrual cycle. Moreover, the PMS-related disability and attitude toward menstruation were investigated as secondary outcomes. Data description: We provide data generated in a randomized controlled trial with two-parallel arms carried out on 92 female university students aged 18-35 years who had moderate to severe PMS, residing at halls of the Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. PMS severity was assessed during two menstrual cycles before intervention (baseline) and during two cycles just after ending the two-month intervention using Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) and the quality of life using the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) on days 1-2 and 11-13 of the menstrual cycle at the baseline and post-intervention. Also, the PMS-related disability was assessed using Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) and attitude toward menstruation using Menstrual Attitude Questionnaire (MAQ) at the baseline and post-intervention. Participant satisfaction and views on intervention effectiveness were also assessed using a single Likert question.
Reproduced under CC-BY.
Topics
Related studies
Systematic review, 2025
Does teaching adolescent girls about their menstrual cycle and health help reduce period pain and PMS?
Systematic review, 2026
Do digital tools and apps help reduce PMS and PMDD symptoms?
Randomised trial, 2022
Does internet-based cognitive-behavioral therapy reduce PMS symptoms and improve quality of life?
Randomised trial, 2023
What does research show about PMDD neurochemistry?
Cohort study, 2010
How do anxiety disorders differ across different life stages?
Randomised trial, 2019
Does online cognitive behavioral therapy help women with PMDD?