Skip to content

Survey study, 2026

Does PMS make it harder for women to work and do daily activities?

Women with PMS did not perform worse on specific work tasks, but those with more severe PMS reported lower quality of life. Maintaining a regular daily routine appeared to help work performance in women with PMS.

Early or limited evidence 53 women of reproductive age, 71.7% with PMS

What they did

Researchers studied 53 women (some with PMS, some without) using questionnaires about PMS severity, work performance, daily activity preferences, and quality of life. They compared women with PMS to those without.

What they found

71.7% of the women experienced PMS. In women with PMS, spending more time on required daily activities was linked to higher work performance and sense of meaning. Higher PMS severity was linked to lower physical quality of life. No direct differences in actual work performance were found between groups.

What it means for you

PMS affects quality of life more than actual work task performance. Keeping a regular daily routine may help women with PMS perform better, possibly because structure helps. This is a small study, and 71.7% having PMS (much higher than expected) suggests it may have enrolled more women with problems.

71.7%

of women experienced PMS

53

women studied

About the study

Original title
How does premenstrual syndrome affect occupational performance?
Authors
Tatlı İY, Kurt G
Journal
BMC women's health
Year
2026
Study design
Survey study
Participants
53
What was tested
None
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

INTRODUCTION: Premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is a condition that affects the quality of life and occupational participation of reproductive age women. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between PMS severity and occupational performance, meaningful time use, and quality of life and to compare these parameters between women with and without PMS. METHODS: Fifty-three women with and without PMS were included in this cross-sectional research. Presence and severity of PMS, occupational problems, daily activity preferences, and quality of life were assessed by the Premenstrual Syndrome Scale (PMSS), Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM), Modified Occupational Questionnaire (MOQ), and 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12), respectively. The Spearman's rank correlation test was used for the relationship, and the Mann–Whitney U test and chi-square test were used for the differences between groups. A significance level of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the total 53 women involved in this study, 71.7% experienced PMS. For the women with PMS, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the total duration of MOQ-obligatory activities and the MOQ-value (rho = 0.430, p = 0.007) and the COPM performance score (rho 0.330, p = 0.046). The results indicated that there was a significant negative correlation between the SF-12 physical and PMSS score (rho = -0.322, p = 0.048). A statistically significant difference was observed in PMSS (p < 0.001) and MOQ value (p = 0.019) scores, with women with PMS scoring higher than those without. CONCLUSION: Although no direct differences in occupational performance were observed between women with and without PMS, the time-use preferences and value perceptions of women experiencing PMS may influence occupational performance in distinct ways. Our findings suggest that maintaining a daily routine has a positive impact on performance among women with PMS, whereas increasing symptom severity is associated with a decline in quality of life.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics