Skip to content

Survey study, 1992

Can daily symptom tracking reliably diagnose PMS?

No. Five different rating methods that doctors have used to diagnose PMS from daily symptom tracking could not reliably separate women with diagnosed PMS from women without symptoms.

Early or limited evidence 31 women meeting DSM-III-R criteria for LLPDD and 34 women with no premenstrual symptoms

What they did

Cross-sectional comparison study examining five different scoring methods that previous research had used to identify PMS from daily symptom ratings. Researchers tested these methods on 31 women who met diagnostic criteria for premenstrual dysphoric disorder and 34 women with no premenstrual symptoms. They also looked at stress levels and whether women felt impaired in their daily lives.

What they found

None of the five change criteria reliably separated women with diagnosed PMS from normally cycling women without symptoms, whether using strict or loose standards. Only one criterion separated the PMS group from women on oral contraceptives. Both groups experienced similar numbers of stressful events, but women with PMS rated their problems as more disturbing. Women with PMS also showed a cyclical pattern of negative work interactions suggesting some impaired functioning.

What it means for you

Daily ratings may not reliably diagnose PMS, though women with it do rate problems as more serious and experience real work difficulties. Better diagnostic methods are needed. Main limits: small sample, single time point, limited rating method details.

31

Women with LLPDD/PMS

34

Women with no symptoms

5

Rating criteria tested

About the study

Original title
Using daily ratings to confirm premenstrual syndrome/late luteal phase dysphoric disorder. Part II. What makes a "real" difference?
Authors
Gallant SJ, Popiel DA, Hoffman DM et al.
Journal
Psychosomatic medicine
Year
1992
Study design
Survey study
Participants
34
What was tested
None - observational study

Topics