Skip to content

Interview study, 2014

How do women cope with premenstrual distress?

Researchers developed the Premenstrual Coping Measure, a valid tool that identifies five main ways women cope with negative premenstrual change: avoiding harm, accepting the changes, adjusting energy, self-care, and communicating. The scale showed good reliability.

Moderate study design 250 Australian women with mild to severe premenstrual distress

What they did

250 Australian women with mild to severe premenstrual distress completed an online survey with 64 items about how they cope. Researchers analyzed the responses to find patterns in coping behaviors.

What they found

Analysis found five types of coping made up of 32 items total. These were labeled Avoiding Harm, Awareness and Acceptance of Premenstrual Change, Adjusting Energy, Self-Care, and Communicating. The five groups showed acceptable to very good reliability.

What it means for you

Researchers now have a tool to measure how women cope with premenstrual distress in future studies. One limit is that some coping behaviors overlap with symptoms of premenstrual change itself, which may relate to cultural beliefs about femininity and PMS.

250

women surveyed

64

items in original survey

5

coping types identified

About the study

Original title
Ways of coping with premenstrual change: development and validation of a premenstrual coping measure
Authors
Read JR, Perz J, Ussher JM
Journal
BMC women's health
Year
2014
Study design
Interview study
Participants
250
What was tested
Development and validation of the Premenstrual Coping Measure
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Background: Negative premenstrual change can result in distress for a significant proportion of women. Previous research has suggested that women employ a range of coping strategies and behaviours in order to manage and reduce premenstrual distress. However, as yet there has been no specific scale available to measure premenstrual coping. This research aimed to develop and validate a measure of premenstrual coping which can be used in future investigations of negative premenstrual experience. Methods: A sample of 250 women living in Australia, reporting mild to severe premenstrual distress, completed an online survey containing 64 items related to premenstrual coping. The items were generated by reviewing past literature related to premenstrual experience, in particular recent qualitative research on premenstrual coping. A principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation was conducted to determine item clusters that would form a measure. Reliability and validity were tested using calculations of Cronbach alphas, correlational analysis with psychological coping scales and a content analysis of participant reports of coping strategies. Results: The factor analysis, which involved two principal component analyses, resulted in five factors containing 32 premenstrual coping behaviours. Interpretation of the factor solution drew on empirical and theoretical accounts of premenstrual coping and the emergent factors were labelled Avoiding Harm, Awareness and Acceptance of Premenstrual Change, Adjusting Energy, Self-Care, and Communicating. These factors form the subscales of the Premenstrual Coping Measure (PMCM). The subscales demonstrated acceptable to very good reliability and tests of construct, concurrent and content validity were supportive of sound validity. Conclusions: The PMCM provides a valid and reliable scale for quantifying ways of coping specific to negative premenstrual change. Conceptual similarity was found between some coping behaviours and behaviours positioned as symptoms of premenstrual change. Explanations for this overlap may be found in cultural discourses associated with idealised femininity and PMS (premenstrual syndrome). Further psychometric investigation of the PMCM will enhance knowledge of the role of coping with negative premenstrual experience.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics