Skip to content

Systematic review, 2025

How do cognition and behavior change across the menstrual cycle in people with PMDD?

Evidence that cognitive abilities change is limited and inconsistent. A negative attention bias (focusing on negative things) appears central to PMDD.

Strong study design 1222 people with and without PMDD (from 21 studies)

What they did

Systematic review of 21 studies that measured cognition or behavior at least twice during the menstrual cycle in people with and without PMDD.

What they found

The researchers extracted 94 outcome measures from 21 papers with 1222 total participants. Cognitive performance was most often tested but evidence of change with PMDD was limited and inconsistent. Studies exploring how people focus attention suggest that a negative attentional bias is central to the psychological experience of PMDD.

What it means for you

How we think and focus may matter more than basic cognitive abilities in understanding PMDD. The main limitation is that researchers could not combine results numerically because included studies did not report key data.

21

Studies reviewed

1222

Total participants

94

Outcome measures extracted

About the study

Original title
Cognition and behaviour across the menstrual cycle in individuals with premenstrual dysphoric disorder - A systematic review
Authors
Henderson A, Gardani M, Dyker G et al.
Journal
Journal of affective disorders
Year
2025
Study design
Systematic review
What was tested
None (systematic review)
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Background: Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD) is a cyclical mood disorder whereby symptoms are triggered by normal hormonal changes during the menstrual cycle. A better understanding of psychological changes that occur with PMDD can inform non-pharmacological and non-invasive treatment interventions. Methods: A systematic review was conducted of quantitative studies that measured any aspect of cognition or behaviour at a minimum of two time points in the menstrual cycle in those with and without PMDD. A narrative synthesis is reported. Results: 94 outcome measures were extracted from 21 papers and a total participant sample of 1222. Risk of bias was noted in relation to lack of power analysis and inappropriate statistical methods. Cognitive performance was most often tested but evidence of change with PMDD was limited and inconsistent. Findings of studies exploring cognitive processes and content suggest that a negative attentional bias is central to the psychological experience of PMDD. Limitations: A quantitative synthesis could not be conducted due to limited reporting of key data. Conclusions: Cognitive process, content, and behaviour are likely to be more informative in understanding PMDD than absolute cognitive abilities. Future studies should aim to investigate such in real-time and within the context of daily living.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics