Skip to content

Survey study, 2018

Does using a smartphone app help PMS symptoms as much as visiting a doctor in person?

Using a smartphone app worked about as well as visiting a doctor for PMS, and women using the app were more satisfied with their care.

Early or limited evidence 60 rural women in China with PMS

What they did

60 rural women with PMS were divided into two equal groups. One group used WeChat on a smartphone to get therapy guidance while the other visited a doctor in person. Both groups received cognitive-behavioral therapy, medicine, and exercise advice tailored to their symptoms. Symptoms were tracked for 5 menstrual cycles after starting treatment and again at 1 year.

What they found

Symptom scores dropped in both groups after treatment started. At the 1-year follow-up, both groups had similar symptom scores. Women in the smartphone group reported higher satisfaction with their treatment than the in-person group.

What it means for you

Remote treatment using a smartphone app can work as well as visiting a doctor for PMS. The study involved a small group in rural China, so larger studies are needed to see if this works in other settings.

60

women studied

5

menstrual cycles tracked

1 year

follow-up time

About the study

Original title
Remote intervention using smartphone for rural women suffering from premenstrual syndrome: A propensity score matched analysis
Authors
Chai N, Wu Y, Zhang M et al.
Journal
Medicine
Year
2018
Study design
Survey study
Participants
60
What was tested
Remote smartphone app (WeChat) with therapy, medicine, and exercise
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Timely treatment of premenstrual syndrome (PMS) is not always available for rural women, because the local medical resources are insufficient. The efficacy of remote intervention by smartphone on PMS has not been confirmed.A retrospective analysis was performed on rural PMS patients between January 2014 and December 2015. After a propensity score matched analysis, 60 patients were enrolled and evenly divided into remote group and outpatient group. Multidisciplinary therapy including cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), oral medication, and physical exercise education was used individually, in accordance with their symptoms evaluated by Daily Record of Severity of Problems (DRSP) questionnaire. Patients in remote group utilized WeChat software by smartphone for therapy guidance, while those in outpatient group attended face-to-face interview. Their DRSP scores in 5 new menstrual cycles after therapy were recorded. Then, they were followed up for 1 year.Total DRSP scores of the cases in both groups after initial intervention were less than those before therapy (P .05). However, patients in remote group indicated a higher satisfactory rate than the outpatient group (P = .03). On the 1-year follow up, patients in both groups demonstrated similar DRSP scores (P = .07), but the satisfactory rate in remote group was encouragingly higher than that in the outpatient group (P = .02).The efficacy of remote intervention using smartphone on PMS is noninferior to traditional outpatient visits. Nevertheless, high-quality trials are needed.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics