Skip to content

Survey study, 2017

Does physical activity reduce PMS symptoms?

No. This study found no significant link between how much women exercise and their PMS symptoms.

Early or limited evidence 414 women aged 18-31

What they did

Cross-sectional study of 414 women aged 18-31. Researchers measured PMS symptoms using a modified symptom calendar and assessed physical activity by self-report.

What they found

Physical activity was not significantly associated with total, affective, or physical symptom scores. Women in the highest activity groups had odds ratios of 1.5 (95% CI: 0.6-3.7) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.4-2.4) for PMS compared to women with the lowest activity (p-value for trend = 0.85).

What it means for you

The study found no clear link between exercise and PMS. The confidence intervals are wide, meaning we cannot be very sure of the results. Women reported their own activity levels, which can be inaccurate. A controlled trial would be needed to know if exercise helps.

414

women studied

80

with moderate-to-severe PMS

0.85

p-value for trend

About the study

Original title
Recreational Physical Activity and Premenstrual Syndrome in Young Adult Women: A Cross-Sectional Study
Authors
Kroll-Desrosiers AR, Ronnenberg AG, Zagarins SE et al.
Journal
PloS one
Year
2017
Study design
Survey study
Participants
414
What was tested
Physical activity (observational, not a trial)
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Introduction: It is estimated that up to 75% of premenopausal women experience at least one premenstrual symptom and 8-20% meet clinical criteria for premenstrual syndrome. Premenstrual syndrome substantially reduces quality of life for many women of reproductive age, with pharmaceutical treatments having limited efficacy and substantial side effects. Physical activity has been recommended as a method of reducing menstrual symptom severity. However, this recommendation is based on relatively little evidence, and the relationship between physical activity, premenstrual symptoms, and premenstrual syndrome remains unclear. Methods: We evaluated the relationship between physical activity and premenstrual syndrome and premenstrual symptoms among 414 women aged 18-31. Usual premenstrual symptom experience was assessed with a modified version of the Calendar of Premenstrual Experiences. Total, physical, and affective premenstrual symptom scores were calculated for all participants. Eighty women met criteria for moderate-to-severe premenstrual syndrome, while 89 met control criteria. Physical activity, along with dietary and lifestyle factors, was assessed by self-report. Results: Physical activity was not significantly associated with total, affective, or physical premenstrual symptom score. Compared to the women with the lowest activity, women in tertiles 2 and 3 of activity, classified as metabolic equivalent task hours, had prevalence odds ratios for premenstrual syndrome of 1.5 (95% CI: 0.6-3.7) and 0.9 (95% CI: 0.4-2.4), respectively (p-value for trend = 0.85). Conclusions: We found no association between physical activity and either premenstrual symptom scores or the prevalence of premenstrual syndrome.

Reproduced under CC-BY.

Topics