Skip to content

Randomised trial, 2021

Is low vitamin D linked to premenstrual symptoms?

Low vitamin D was linked to two specific physical symptoms, breast tenderness and body aches, but not to emotional PMS symptoms. The evidence is not yet definitive.

Moderate study design 1191 women aged 18-40 in EAGeR cohort and 76 women aged 18-44 in BioCycle cohort, all with regular menstrual cycles

What they did

Analysis of two existing cohorts of women with regular menstrual cycles. EAGeR: 1191 women aged 18-40 who reported PMS symptoms from the previous year. BioCycle: 76 women aged 18-44 whose symptoms were tracked prospectively over 2 menstrual cycles. Both studies measured blood vitamin D levels. Researchers assessed associations between low vitamin D and individual PMS symptoms.

What they found

In the EAGeR cohort, women with vitamin D insufficiency (below 30 ng/ml) had 1.27 times higher risk of breast fullness and tenderness and 1.33 times higher risk of generalized aches and pains. Results in the smaller BioCycle cohort were less clear. No associations were found between vitamin D and psychological symptoms in either cohort.

What it means for you

Low vitamin D may be linked to some physical PMS symptoms but not emotional ones. The evidence is stronger in the larger study. This does not prove vitamin D causes these symptoms.

1191

Women in main EAGeR cohort

1.27

Risk increase for breast tenderness

1.33

Risk increase for body aches

About the study

Original title
Markers of vitamin D metabolism and premenstrual symptoms in healthy women with regular cycles
Authors
Alkhalaf Z, Kim K, Kuhr DL et al.
Journal
Human reproduction (Oxford, England)
Year
2021
Study design
Randomised trial
Participants
1,191
What was tested
No intervention tested (observational study)
Open access
Yes
Original abstract

Study question: Are insufficient 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) concentrations, and other markers of vitamin D metabolism, associated with premenstrual symptoms in healthy women with regular menstrual cycles? Summary answer: 25(OH)D insufficiency was associated with specific physical premenstrual symptoms, while no associations were observed with psychological symptoms or with other markers of vitamin D metabolism. What is known already: Prior studies evaluating vitamin D and premenstrual symptoms have yielded mixed results, and it is unknown whether 25(OH)D insufficiency and other markers of vitamin D metabolism are associated with premenstrual symptoms. Study design, size, duration: We used two cohorts of women with regular menstrual cycles; 1191 women aged 18-40 years in EAGeR (cross-sectional analysis of a prospective cohort within a randomized trial) and 76 women aged 18-44 years in BioCycle (prospective cohort). In EAGeR, premenstrual symptoms over the previous year were assessed at baseline, whereas in BioCycle, symptoms were assessed prospectively at multiple points over two menstrual cycles with symptoms queried over the previous week. In both cohorts, symptomatology was assessed via questionnaire regarding presence and severity of 14 physical and psychological symptoms the week before and after menses. Both studies measured 25(OH)D in serum. We also evaluated the association of additional markers of vitamin D metabolism and calcium homeostasis, including intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcium (Ca), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), and 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) with premenstrual symptoms in the BioCycle cohort. Participants/materials, setting, methods: One cohort of women actively seeking pregnancy (Effects of Aspirin in Gestation and Reproduction (EAGeR)) and one cohort not seeking pregnancy (BioCycle) were evaluated. Log-binomial regression was used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 95% CIs for associations between insufficient 25(OH)D (<30 ng/ml) and individual premenstrual symptoms, adjusting for age, BMI, race, smoking, income, physical activity, and season of blood draw. Main results and the role of chance: 25(OH)D insufficiency was associated with increased risk of breast fullness/tenderness (EAGeR RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.03, 1.55; BioCycle RR 1.37, 95% CI 0.56, 3.32) and generalized aches and pains (EAGeR RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.01, 1.78; BioCycle 1.36, 95% CI 0.41, 4.45), though results were imprecise in the BioCycle study. No associations were observed between insufficient 25(OH)D and psychological symptoms in either cohort. In BioCycle, iPTH, Ca, FGF23, and 1,25(OH) 2D were not associated with any premenstrual symptoms. Limitations, reasons for caution: Results from the EAGeR study were limited by the study design, which assessed both 25(OH)D at baseline and individual premenstrual symptoms over the past year at the baseline. As such, reverse causality is a potential concern. Though premenstrual symptoms were assessed prospectively in the BioCycle cohort, the power was limited due to small sample size. However, results were fairly consistent across both studies. Wider implications of the findings: Serum 25(OH)D may be associated with risk and severity of specific physical premenstrual symptoms. Study funding/competing interest(s): This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland (Contract nos. HHSN267200603423, HHSN267200603424, and HHSN267200603426). JG.R. and D.L.K. have been funded by the NIH Medical Research Scholars Program, a public-private partnership jointly supported by the NIH and generous contributions to the Foundation for the NIH by the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (Grant #2014194), the American Association for Dental Research, the Colgate Palmolive Company, Genentech, and other private donors. For a complete list, visit the foundation website at http://www.fnih.org. The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00467363.

Reproduced under public-domain.

Topics